We assess your Azure environment against Microsoft's Well-Architected Framework, reliability, security, cost optimization, operational excellence, and performance efficiency, so you get an objective score, not a sales pitch dressed as an audit.
Each engagement follows the same structure Microsoft itself recommends, run by engineers who work in Azure every day.
We start by reviewing all five pillars against the scope of your environment, so the engagement targets what actually matters to your business.
We meet with IT, leadership, and finance to understand your current state, constraints, and goals, not just read your architecture diagrams.
We collect data across your Azure subscriptions and analyze it against Microsoft's own best practices, pillar by pillar.
The engagement ends with an executive summary, a detailed roadmap, and an action plan for closing the gaps we found.
One engagement, invisible from inside the Azure portal until someone went looking.
A 600-person manufacturer came to us ahead of a cyber insurance renewal, worried its Azure footprint wouldn't hold up to the questionnaire. The assessment found four subscriptions still carrying owner-level access for contractors who'd left over a year earlier, backup vaults with no tested restore on record, and a resource group with no cost tags at all. None of it showed up in the monthly Azure Cost Management report.
Five things that separate a real assessment from a checklist you already know the answers to.
If your objection isn't here, ask an engineer directly.
Two to three weeks, one scored report, no pitch deck. Just where you stand against Microsoft's own framework.
